Adult star claims to have sexual encounter with Donald Trump


Donald Trump

In a Manhattan courtroom on Tuesday, adult film star Stormy Daniels recounted in detail her 2006 encounter with Donald Trump in a penthouse suite. Donald Trump, prior to engaging in sexual activity, reassured Daniels not to be concerned about his wife and even drew a parallel between her and his daughter.

The journalists present in the courtroom reported Daniels’ testimony, which provided a graphic description of her intimate rendezvous with the former president. Donald Trump, currently facing charges in New York regarding the concealment of hush-money payments to Daniels, denies the encounter, marking this trial as the first instance of a former president facing criminal charges.

Daniels took the stand during the trial’s fourth week to substantiate prosecutors’ claims of Trump’s efforts to cover up a $130,000 payment aimed at silencing her during his 2016 presidential campaign. Allegations against DOnald Trump include disguising payments, later reimbursed to his former lawyer Michael Cohen, as “legal expenses.”

The trial opened with testimony from Sally Franklin, an executive and editor at Penguin Random House, the publisher of select Trump books. Jurors were presented with excerpts from Trump’s literary works, highlighting his claims of meticulous financial management.

Earlier witnesses, including former and current finance employees of the Trump Organization, provided testimony regarding payments to Cohen, supplemented by financial documentation, aiming to establish Trump’s involvement in these transactions.

This New York trial marks the first of four criminal indictments against Trump to proceed to trial, while a federal judge in Florida indefinitely postponed the trial date for Trump’s classified documents case.

During her lengthy testimony, Daniels elaborated on her interactions with Trump, delineating their initial encounter at a 2006 golf tournament and subsequent engagements. Despite objections from Trump’s defense team and occasional judicial interventions, Daniels persisted in delivering her narrative, including her decision to sever communication with Trump in 2007 and subsequent encounters marked by threats and attempts to sell her story.

Trump’s defense team attempted to discredit Daniels’ testimony, scrutinizing her motives and narrative consistency, yet the judge dismissed their motion for a mistrial.

As the trial unfolds, Trump maintains his innocence, expressing dismay on his social media platform and facing penalties for breaching a gag order pertaining to witness commentary.

Follow for more.

Your reaction?
Angry
0
Angry
Cute
0
Cute
Fail
0
Fail
Geeky
0
Geeky
Lol
0
Lol
Love
0
Love
OMG
0
OMG
Win
0
Win
WTF
0
WTF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

log in

reset password

Back to
log in